Manchester United Frustrated as FIFA Backs Morocco in Mazraoui AFCON Dispute
Manchester United’s preparations for their clash against Bournemouth were disrupted after Morocco refused to release Noussair Mazraoui, leaving the club frustrated and ultimately overruled by FIFA. The situation has drawn fresh attention to the ongoing tension between clubs and national teams, particularly during Africa Cup of Nations periods that cut through the heart of the domestic season.
The dispute centres on FIFA guidance stating that players selected for AFCON squads must be released by their clubs seven days before their nation’s first match, with the official release period beginning on December 15. Morocco acted firmly within that framework, insisting Mazraoui report for international duty despite United believing they were entitled to keep the defender available for the Bournemouth fixture.
Manchester United had expected Mazraoui to feature, especially given their defensive issues and the importance of continuity during a demanding run of fixtures. When Morocco declined United’s initial request, club officials escalated the matter to FIFA, seeking clarification and hoping for a ruling in their favour. However, FIFA sided with the Moroccan Football Federation, citing their own regulations and confirming that the release window had already opened.
Headlines quickly captured United’s sense of irritation, framing the episode as another example of the club being undermined by off-field complications. “United Lose Mazraoui Battle,” “FIFA Backs Morocco,” and “AFCON Rules Frustrate Old Trafford” dominated coverage, adding to the narrative of a club struggling to maintain control during a turbulent period.
From Morocco’s perspective, the stance was straightforward. With AFCON fast approaching, national teams are keen to avoid unnecessary risks and ensure full preparation time with their squads. Mazraoui is considered an important figure, and allowing him to play club football during the release period carried the risk of injury or fatigue. FIFA’s backing reinforced Morocco’s position and underlined the authority of international regulations over club preferences.
For United, the ruling forced last-minute adjustments. Mazraoui’s absence reduced options at full-back and disrupted tactical planning, particularly at a time when manager Rúben Amorim has been under pressure to stabilise performances. While the club stopped short of publicly criticising FIFA, sources suggest there was clear disappointment behind the scenes, especially given the belief that the defender would have been available.
The incident also highlights a broader issue faced by Premier League clubs during AFCON years. Unlike European Championships or World Cups, AFCON often takes place mid-season, creating conflicts that can weaken squads at crucial moments. Managers and clubs regularly express frustration, but FIFA’s regulations consistently prioritise international tournaments.
For Amorim, the timing could hardly have been worse. Already dealing with scrutiny over results, tactics, and squad balance, the loss of Mazraoui added another complication to matchday planning. It also reignited debate among fans about depth, recruitment, and whether United are adequately equipped to cope with international call-ups.
As AFCON approaches, Manchester United now know they must plan without Mazraoui for the foreseeable future. The episode serves as a reminder that, in modern football, challenges extend beyond the pitch. Regulations, international commitments, and governing bodies can have a decisive impact on results — and once again, United have found themselves on the wrong side of the rulebook.
